02/26/2024 / By Ethan Huff
Before the world had even heard of the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19), Prof. Ralph Baric, PhD, from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC) knew about it, having received prototype mRNA (modRNA) “vaccines” from none other than Moderna.
Newly unearthed documents that were supposed to remain confidential show that Cambridge, Mass.-based Moderna sent the prototype vials to UNC several weeks before COVID was announced to the world. Baric signed the material transfer agreement for them on Dec. 12, 2019, followed by a signature from Jacqueline Quay, Director of Licensing and Innovation Support at UNC, on Dec. 16, 2019.
Two representatives from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), the federal agency that was then headed up by Tony Fauci under the umbrella of the then-Francis Collins-led National Institutes of Health (NIH), also signed the agreement. One was Amy F. Petrik, PhD, a technology transfer specialist, and the other was Barney Graham, MD, PhD, an investigator.
On Dec. 17, 2019, the final signatories of the agreement were Sunny Himansu, Moderna’s investigator, and Shaun Ryan, Moderna’s deputy general counsel.
“All of these signatures were made prior to any knowledge of the alleged emergence of the novel coronavirus,” notes The Exposé (United Kingdom).
“It wasn’t until December 31st 2019 that the World Health Organisation (WHO) became aware of an alleged cluster of viral pneumonia cases in Wuhan, China. But even at this point, they had not determined that an alleged new coronavirus was to blame, instead stating the pneumonia was of ‘unknown cause.'”
(Related: Did you know that Moderna’s marketing arm colluded with U.S. law enforcement to spy on Americans and shut down public vaccine skepticism?)
It would take several weeks after all these people signed Moderna’s material transfer agreement that the WHO would officially dub the unknown outbreak a “novel coronavirus,” though Moderna somehow knew weeks in advance that it needed to release a “vaccine” for it – and Moderna somehow already had the “vaccine” fully developed.
Keep in mind that in 2019 when all of this criminality took place between Moderna and UNC, there were no coronaviruses in known existence that posed a threat to humanity as was later claimed in early 2020. Truth be told, there is still no evidence that a real coronavirus ever posed a threat to humanity in 2020 or 2021, either.
The “testing” was a sham, as were the “vaccines.” Faulty PCR tests were abnormally and inappropriately tuned to a high cycle rate, which created the illusion of a coronavirus crisis – but still to this day, SARS-CoV-2 has never been isolated using Koch’s postulates, meaning it has never been proven to exist in the first place.
“Considering the fact a faulty PCR test has been used at a high cycle rate, hospitals have been empty in comparison to previous years, statistics show just 0.2% of those allegedly infected have died within 28 days of an alleged positive test result, the majority of those deaths by a mile have been people over the age of 85, and a mass of those deaths were caused by a drug called midazolam, which causes respiratory depression, and respiratory arrest,” The Exposé further explains about the situation.
“Perhaps Moderna and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases would like to explain themselves in a court of law?”
In the comments, someone else noted that as more and more of this damning information comes to light, the COVID house of cards continues to fall.
“There’s no way to stop it anymore,” this same individual added about the inevitable.
More of the latest news about Big Pharma corruption can be found at BadMedicine.news.
Sources for this article include:
Tagged Under:
Big Pharma, Censored Science, COVID, covid-19, deep state, Moderna, mRNA, pandemic, pharma fraud, Ralph Baric, science deception, UNC, University of North Carolina, vaccine wars, vaccines, Wuhan
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
COPYRIGHT © 2017 UNEXPLAINED.NEWS
All content posted on this site is protected under Free Speech. Unexplained.news is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Unexplained.news assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and service marks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.